Anomaly of the perception of the length of sloped lines

Bondarko, V.M., Solnushkin, S.D., Chikhman, V.N.

Full text «Opticheskii Zhurnal»

Full text on elibrary.ru

Publication in Journal of Optical Technology

For Russian citation (Opticheskii Zhurnal):

Бондарко В.М., Солнушкин С.Д., Чихман В.Н. Аномалия восприятия длины наклонных линий // Оптический журнал. 2020. Т. 87. № 1. С. 69–76. http://doi.org/10.17586/1023-5086-2020-86-01-69-76

Bondarko V.M., Solnushkin S.D., Chikhman V.N. Anomaly of the perception of the length of sloped lines [in Russian] // Opticheskii Zhurnal. 2020. V. 87. № 1. P. 69–76. http://doi.org/10.17586/1023-5086-2020-86-01-69-76

For citation (Journal of Optical Technology):

V. M. Bondarko, S. D. Solnushkin, and V. N. Chikhman, "Anomaly of the perception of the length of sloped lines," Journal of Optical Technology. 87(1), 56-62 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOT.87.000056

Abstract:

This paper describes psychophysical experiments in which three observers estimated the length of lines that differ in orientation and lie at various distances from each other. Distortions of the estimated length of up to 15%–20% are obtained, depending on how the lines are oriented. The average strength of the illusion was less by a factor of 1.3 in the case of contiguous lines than when the lines were located in space at angular distances of 2.4° and 5.8°. The distortions were insignificantly less in the case of short lines. The maximum illusion is obtained for an orientation of 60° and 120° of contiguous lines with angular length 2.1°. In most of the other cases, the maximum distortions are detected for an orientation of 90°. Possible mechanisms for the appearance of the illusion are discussed—in particular, those that explain the illusion by the statistics of two-dimensional projections of three-dimensional scenes, the theory of perspective, or the association of the illusion with an elliptical shape of the field of view.

Keywords:

length of lines estimation, orientation dependance, vertical–horizontal illusion

Acknowledgements:

The research was supported by the Program of Fundamental Scientific Research of State Academies in 2013–2020 (GP-14, Section 63).

OCIS codes: 330.7326, 330.4060, 330.5510

References:

1. G. I. Rozhkova, V. S. Tokareva, V. V. Ognivov, and V. A. Bastakov, “Geometrical visual illusions and the mechanisms of constancy of size perception in children,” Sens. Sist. 19(1), 26–36 (2005).
2. T. M. Künnapas, “An analysis of the ‘vertical-horizontal illusion’,” J. Exp. Psychol. 49, 134–140 (1955).
3. G. C. Avery and R. H. Day, “Basis of the horizontal-vertical illusion,” J. Exp. Psychol. 81, 376–380 (1969).
4. U. Wolfe, L. T. Maloney, and M. Tam, “Distortions of perceived length in the frontoparallel plane: Tests of perspective theories,” Percept. Psychophys. 67(6), 967–979 (2005).

5. P. Mamassian and M. de Montalembert, “A simple model of the vertical-horizontal illusion,” Vis. Res. 50, 956–962 (2010).
6. W. Prinzmetal and L. Gettlemann, “Vertical–horizontal illusion: one eye is better than two,” Percept. Psychophys. 53(1), 81–88 (1993).
7. E. O. Cormack and R. H. Cormack, “Stimulus configuration and line orientation in the horizontal-vertical illusion,” Percep. Psychophys. 16, 208–212 (1974).
8. R. L. Gregory, The Intelligent Eye: Learning to Think by Looking at Art (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, 1970; Editorial URSS, Moscow, 1972).
9. C. Q. Howe and D. Purves, “Range image statistics can explain the anomalous perception of length,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 13184–13188 (2002).
10. C. Q. Howe and D. Purves, “Natural-scene geometry predicts the perception of angles and line orientation,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 1228–1233 (2005).
11. K. Landwehr, “Titchener’s ⊥ with its lines tilted—a partial replication and extension of Cormack and Cormack (1974),” Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 79, 223–229 (2017).
12. D. A. Begelman and G. Steinfeld, “An investigation of several parameters of the horizontal–vertical illusion,” Percept. Psychoph. 2(11), 539–543 (1967).
13. C. A. Curcio, K. R. Sloan, R. E. Kalina, and E. Hendrickson, “Human photoreceptor topography,” J. Comp. Neurol. 292, 497–523 (1990).
14. Th. Lipps, “Die geometrisch-optischen Täuschungen (Vorläufige Mitteilung),” Z. Psych. Physiol. Sinnesorg. 12, 39–59 (1896).
15. S. V. Kravkov, The Eye and Its Functions (Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1950).
16. I. D. Artamonov, Visual Illusions (Nauka, Moscow, 1969).
17. V. M. Bondarko and L. A. Semenov, “Vertical–horizontal illusion under conditions of various positions of the lines,” Sens. Sist. 27(4), 305–312 (2013).
18. T. M. Künnapas, “Influence of frame size on apparent length of a line,” J. Exp. Psychol. 50, 168–170 (1955).
19. R. O. Malashin and A. B. Kadykov, “Investigation of the generalizing capabilities of convolutional neural networks in forming rotation-invariant attributes,” J. Opt. Technol. 82(8), 509–515 (2015) [Opt. Zh. 82(8), 24–32 (2015)].
20. P. B. Hibbard and P. Scarfe, “Misperception of aspect ratio in binocularly viewed surfaces,” Vis. Res. 70, 34–43 (2012).
21. A. Bulatov, A. Bertulis, and I. Kochanene, “Study of the difference of sizes as a function of the orientation of the stimuli,” Sens. Sist. (4), 28–43 (1996).